@0:28 you say, ” … @0:28 you say, “Radioactive atoms are called isotopes.”
The term isotope does not indicate radioactivity, nor stability. “Isotope” just indicates different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus of a given element. For example, hydrogen has 3 isotopes: one with 0 neutrons (1H), one with 1 neutron (2H), and one with 2 neutrons (3H).
Some of an element’s isotopes can be radioactive & others can be stable. For example, the 1H isotope of hydrogen is stable whereas 3H is radioactive.
I agree in that evo theory is a philosophy & doctrine of secular humanism, the latter of which NEEDS evo to seem coherent. Look up the “…divine foot in the door” quote by Richard Lewontin, who makes it abundantly clear.
Evodelusionism is … Evodelusionism is the religion used to support “the theory of evolution”, which is based on a pagan religion from over 2000 years ago. It is the brainwashing used to inflict this magical, mystical nonsense on young children to indoctrinate into this delusional cult. Mythology has never left science. It degrades science to have this HEMG nonsense “pseudo science” in schools. All religions should be removed from public schools.
What is the point … What is the point of the very loud German national anthem in the background. One it is highly distracting. Two it has nothing to do with the matter in hand. Thirdly it seems to be an old nazi era recording. If you meant to imply your opponents were some how tainted with nazism you are despicable, people who use such low slurs are generally signalling they have lost the argument.
Yes, he said many … Yes, he said many times that his race was created the best by God and that it was the creator’s will to exterminate the lesser races. He made no effort to wipe out religion and was backed by the Catholic Church early on.
You must be very ignorant.
Now you’re just … Now you’re just making up. Evolution is only 150 years old this month. Stalin and Hitler both hated evolution and even if they didn’t, the validity of a scientific theory has nothing to do with politics or the politicians who do or do not endorse it.
I gave you examples of evidence for evolution. Please explain those in any way other than evolution.
You can’t. Evolution is the only theory that does explain those observations, hence it remains a part of science whether you like it or not.
The theory of … The theory of evodelusion is an utter fraud.
It was put in science from a religion.
It was part of a religion from over 2000 years ago. It is the pet of communists and facists.
You are too ignorant and you are taught to be that way. They control your mind, because you are weak and need to conform to bull shit. Weak people don’t stand a chance against such a big lie that is fed with such careful indoctrination and brainwashing. Read my post on “cults” and maybe you will get it.
Scientists don’t … Scientists don’t get rid of theories for no reason. Abandoning a theory that works (and evolution does describe most of what we observe in nature and contradicts none of it) and replacing it with nothing moves us backwards. Einstein noted that Newton’s mechanics didn’t work; he didn’t throw it out, he improved it. That’s how science works. You want to get rid of a theory: make a better one.
Until then you’re just an uneducated (and proud of it) braggart with a chip on your shoulder.
Evodelusionism is a … Evodelusionism is a joke. I have not met any people with lower intelligence, and such poor logical skills. Your emotions rule you. You are a slave to this crap.
Frist; Who told … Frist; Who told you that, and why were you so eager to destroy any truth in science by filling your mind with unproven nonsense.
What happened to those other fools is what they are doing to you. If you want to be free then start thinking in terms of what is absolutely proven, and not some bull continuous lineage of BS opinions.
“If you have some … “If you have some other theory that correlates”
There is no theory that works. Why is that an argument? You don’t need any theories if all you can come up with is another religion.
Your forum is a … Your forum is a joke, your arguments are a joke, your HEMG is a joke, and your imaginary credentials are a joke.
Enjoy living in your happy little microcosm where your yoga experience is applicable to the results of centuries of combined postgraduate research. Good day.
Could you clarify … Could you clarify the word “neutral” for me please? The forum administrator (you I presume) ranting about evodelusionism and how evolutionary scientists are too afraid to debate someone as intelligent (read: self aggrandizing) as you hardly seems to fit with my understanding of the word neutral. My favorite:
“Keep in mind that I came to my own conclusions long before I read any of these other people’s works.” So in other words you decided dating didn’t work before you knew what it was?
Only a weak needy … Only a weak needy person must have answers to questions that have no answers. That is the short version. Being so needy and fearful is a cause of delusion.
I prefer to study all that mankind has to offer and remain objective and NEVER DECLARE any allegiance to any dogma of any religion. I only go with what has empirical and absolute evidence.
Google ” Neutral Evolution Forum Index” and post questions there.
There is no evidence for the foundational and final premises of this nonsense.
If you have some … If you have some other theory that correlates all the natural observations that evolution does and more, I’m all ears. If you’re going to at me about your yoga HEMG nonsense, then I have better things to do with my time.
“HEMG” isn’t nearly as clever as you think it is. It’s a nonsensical, baseless, ad hominem attack against anyone who disagrees with you personally.
While I agree that … While I agree that 500 characters is too brief to really get into the meat of things, I’m alarmed that you failed to read even my short response. Science does not and should not claim to have “absolute” evidence of anything. The evidence for evolution is as strong as the evidence would be expected for any other theory.
bring this over to … bring this over to the Neutral Evolution Forum Index and we can discuss in great detail all your evidence. 500 characters is too small and you can put videos in your posts. None of those are absolute evidence. I will teach you why.
“If evolution were … “If evolution were … no arguing at all”
First: science never says anything is absolutely true. Familiarize yourself with Last Thursdayism and try to disprove it. All science can do is produce the most consistent and simplest (Occam) description of the world, and evo is part of that description.
More egregiously, does any idiot arguing with something instantly make it false? Huh? I’m going to argue that the sky isn’t blue; does that mean “the sky is blue” isn’t true?
Because it’s … Because it’s religions that try to tell us we’re wrong and that their centuries old book written by ignorant bigots with zero evidence for its claims is right.
You want evidence? talkorigins(dot)org(slash)faqs(slash)comdesc
The short list:
Human chromosome 2
vitamin C production
vestigial organs
transitional fossils
geographic distribution of species
observed speciation
and the holy grail: the overlap of independently developed phylogenetic trees
Why is it that … Why is it that Evodelusionists, a religious belief, always argues with religions. If it was really a science then it would not argue with religions. If evolution were absolutely true there would be no arguing at all. But since is is a religion with only opinions by brainwashed, indoctrinated, children it can never be shown to be real.
If you have absolute evidence of evolution with no opinions where is it?
google “Neutral Evolution Forum Index” and post all the evidence you want.
am i missing … am i missing something here about the wood? do we know the exact amount of C14 in every chunk of wood? if yes then i understand. if no then you used your own theory to disprove yourself.
Serious Problems With Radiometric
@0:37 you say that …
@0:37 you say that the half-life of 14C is 5568 years.
That is wrong. The half-life of carbon-14 is about 5,730 years: 5,730 +/- 40 years. Your value is not within the accepted range.
@0:28 you say, ” …
@0:28 you say, “Radioactive atoms are called isotopes.”
The term isotope does not indicate radioactivity, nor stability. “Isotope” just indicates different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus of a given element. For example, hydrogen has 3 isotopes: one with 0 neutrons (1H), one with 1 neutron (2H), and one with 2 neutrons (3H).
Some of an element’s isotopes can be radioactive & others can be stable. For example, the 1H isotope of hydrogen is stable whereas 3H is radioactive.
Thx f/ the def.
…
Thx f/ the def.
I agree in that evo theory is a philosophy & doctrine of secular humanism, the latter of which NEEDS evo to seem coherent. Look up the “…divine foot in the door” quote by Richard Lewontin, who makes it abundantly clear.
Evodelusionism is …
Evodelusionism is the religion used to support “the theory of evolution”, which is based on a pagan religion from over 2000 years ago. It is the brainwashing used to inflict this magical, mystical nonsense on young children to indoctrinate into this delusional cult. Mythology has never left science. It degrades science to have this HEMG nonsense “pseudo science” in schools. All religions should be removed from public schools.
What is …
What is evodelusionism?
What is the point …
What is the point of the very loud German national anthem in the background. One it is highly distracting. Two it has nothing to do with the matter in hand. Thirdly it seems to be an old nazi era recording. If you meant to imply your opponents were some how tainted with nazism you are despicable, people who use such low slurs are generally signalling they have lost the argument.
Yes, he said many …
Yes, he said many times that his race was created the best by God and that it was the creator’s will to exterminate the lesser races. He made no effort to wipe out religion and was backed by the Catholic Church early on.
You must be very ignorant.
I don’t make …
I don’t make up. Hitler was into the perfect race and he did everything he could to wipe out religion.
You must be very young.
Now you’re just …
Now you’re just making up. Evolution is only 150 years old this month. Stalin and Hitler both hated evolution and even if they didn’t, the validity of a scientific theory has nothing to do with politics or the politicians who do or do not endorse it.
I gave you examples of evidence for evolution. Please explain those in any way other than evolution.
You can’t. Evolution is the only theory that does explain those observations, hence it remains a part of science whether you like it or not.
The theory of …
The theory of evodelusion is an utter fraud.
It was put in science from a religion.
It was part of a religion from over 2000 years ago. It is the pet of communists and facists.
You are too ignorant and you are taught to be that way. They control your mind, because you are weak and need to conform to bull shit. Weak people don’t stand a chance against such a big lie that is fed with such careful indoctrination and brainwashing. Read my post on “cults” and maybe you will get it.
Scientists don’t …
Scientists don’t get rid of theories for no reason. Abandoning a theory that works (and evolution does describe most of what we observe in nature and contradicts none of it) and replacing it with nothing moves us backwards. Einstein noted that Newton’s mechanics didn’t work; he didn’t throw it out, he improved it. That’s how science works. You want to get rid of a theory: make a better one.
Until then you’re just an uneducated (and proud of it) braggart with a chip on your shoulder.
Evodelusionism is a …
Evodelusionism is a joke. I have not met any people with lower intelligence, and such poor logical skills. Your emotions rule you. You are a slave to this crap.
Frist; Who told …
Frist; Who told you that, and why were you so eager to destroy any truth in science by filling your mind with unproven nonsense.
What happened to those other fools is what they are doing to you. If you want to be free then start thinking in terms of what is absolutely proven, and not some bull continuous lineage of BS opinions.
“If you have some …
“If you have some other theory that correlates”
There is no theory that works. Why is that an argument? You don’t need any theories if all you can come up with is another religion.
You can post …
You can post anything you have. It is open for you to produce your evidence. What is your problems with expanding your awareness?
Your forum is a …
Your forum is a joke, your arguments are a joke, your HEMG is a joke, and your imaginary credentials are a joke.
Enjoy living in your happy little microcosm where your yoga experience is applicable to the results of centuries of combined postgraduate research. Good day.
Could you clarify …
Could you clarify the word “neutral” for me please? The forum administrator (you I presume) ranting about evodelusionism and how evolutionary scientists are too afraid to debate someone as intelligent (read: self aggrandizing) as you hardly seems to fit with my understanding of the word neutral. My favorite:
“Keep in mind that I came to my own conclusions long before I read any of these other people’s works.” So in other words you decided dating didn’t work before you knew what it was?
Only a weak needy …
Only a weak needy person must have answers to questions that have no answers. That is the short version. Being so needy and fearful is a cause of delusion.
I prefer to study all that mankind has to offer and remain objective and NEVER DECLARE any allegiance to any dogma of any religion. I only go with what has empirical and absolute evidence.
Google ” Neutral Evolution Forum Index” and post questions there.
There is no evidence for the foundational and final premises of this nonsense.
If you have some …
If you have some other theory that correlates all the natural observations that evolution does and more, I’m all ears. If you’re going to at me about your yoga HEMG nonsense, then I have better things to do with my time.
“HEMG” isn’t nearly as clever as you think it is. It’s a nonsensical, baseless, ad hominem attack against anyone who disagrees with you personally.
While I agree that …
While I agree that 500 characters is too brief to really get into the meat of things, I’m alarmed that you failed to read even my short response. Science does not and should not claim to have “absolute” evidence of anything. The evidence for evolution is as strong as the evidence would be expected for any other theory.
bring this over to …
bring this over to the Neutral Evolution Forum Index and we can discuss in great detail all your evidence. 500 characters is too small and you can put videos in your posts. None of those are absolute evidence. I will teach you why.
“If evolution were …
“If evolution were … no arguing at all”
First: science never says anything is absolutely true. Familiarize yourself with Last Thursdayism and try to disprove it. All science can do is produce the most consistent and simplest (Occam) description of the world, and evo is part of that description.
More egregiously, does any idiot arguing with something instantly make it false? Huh? I’m going to argue that the sky isn’t blue; does that mean “the sky is blue” isn’t true?
Because it’s …
Because it’s religions that try to tell us we’re wrong and that their centuries old book written by ignorant bigots with zero evidence for its claims is right.
You want evidence? talkorigins(dot)org(slash)faqs(slash)comdesc
The short list:
Human chromosome 2
vitamin C production
vestigial organs
transitional fossils
geographic distribution of species
observed speciation
and the holy grail: the overlap of independently developed phylogenetic trees
Why is it that …
Why is it that Evodelusionists, a religious belief, always argues with religions. If it was really a science then it would not argue with religions. If evolution were absolutely true there would be no arguing at all. But since is is a religion with only opinions by brainwashed, indoctrinated, children it can never be shown to be real.
If you have absolute evidence of evolution with no opinions where is it?
google “Neutral Evolution Forum Index” and post all the evidence you want.
am i missing …
am i missing something here about the wood? do we know the exact amount of C14 in every chunk of wood? if yes then i understand. if no then you used your own theory to disprove yourself.